Review character and shot continuity with reference checks, timestamped footage and take comparisons. Keep intended state distinct from observed evidence.
Real controls, in a real project. Explore reference approval, version changes and footage inspection using the included example film.
Actual browser studio captures, 25 October 2026. The included film and locally imported sample footage demonstrate the controls. No AI generation or automated visual assessment was used for these captures.
Make inconsistencies visible. Keep the final judgment yours.
Compare a take’s requested shot specification with currently reviewed references and scoped wardrobe, props, environment and lighting. A mismatch in those records is a production finding, separate from a visual judgment about the footage.
Production Tools → Continuity & footage search → Reviewed specification inspector
Capture three timestamped samples from an actual local clip, with source identity and available audio measurements. Open the source at the sampled moment. An action between samples can be missed; script text and prompts do not become observations of the footage.
Production Tools → Footage search → Index selected footage locally
Add visual or audio notes locally. Optional model captions and visible-text observations require consent to share sampled frames and remain suggestions until reviewed. Confirm or reject the observation; audio measurements do not transcribe speech.
Footage evidence → Notes · Optional model captions and visible text
Search indexed observations and open matching footage at its timestamp. Results retain their evidence source and review state, so a confirmed note stays distinguishable from an unreviewed model suggestion. Missing or changed media cannot stand in as verified evidence.
Production Tools → Footage search → Search observed footage
Read recorded edits and references alongside aligned sample frames, duration, brightness and color differences. Synchronized take comparison helps inspect the result. Those measurements do not establish character identity, performance or the cause of a visual difference.
Take comparison → What changed? · Mac → Generate Video → Take Review
Use the evidence to keep a candidate, reject it or plan another change. A fixed painted grading region does not track a moving subject or generate a replacement. Review the whole result and any continuation seam before choosing what enters the cut.
Candidate comparison → Accept or reject · Continuation preview
Browser and Mac provide production tools for footage review, continuity inspection and local candidates. Sampled evidence does not cover every frame or guarantee character consistency. Review the actual footage; no observation automatically updates the story, references or approved cut.
Make inconsistencies visible. Keep the final judgment yours.
Version mismatch to review
This checks the production records. It says nothing about the jacket visible in the footage.Possible wardrobe mismatch
Compare the candidate frame with Maya reference v2. Lighting may explain the difference; filmmaker review is required.A reference tells you what was intended. The footage shows what was made. Production checks and evidence-based review bring possible discrepancies to the filmmaker with context.
Browser and Mac provide production tools for footage review, continuity inspection and local candidates. Sampled evidence does not cover every frame or guarantee character consistency. Review the actual footage; no observation automatically updates the story, references or approved cut.
Return to the real studio capturesJoin the moviefactory.ai early-access community. Bring your ideas, your perspective and your ambition. Help shape a filmmaking studio built for independent voices everywhere.